Bruneau v. Aquinas College

District Court, W.D. Michigan·Decided October 26, 2021·No. 1:19-cv-01037·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOSEPH BRUNEAU,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:19-cv-1037 v. HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY AQUINAS COLLEGE,

Defendant. ____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit by filing a complaint on December 10, 2019. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on October 5, 2021, recommending that this Court grant the motion and enter judgment. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 70) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 49) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that for the same reasons the Court concludes that Plaintiff’s claims are properly dismissed, the Court also concludes that any issue Plaintiff might raise on appeal would be frivolous. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). Accordingly, the Court certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.

Dated: October 26, 2021 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruneau v. Aquinas College, (W.D. Mich. 2021).

Bruneau v. Aquinas College (Bruneau v. Aquinas College) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)