Brummett v. Parson

619 P.2d 1355, 49 Or. App. 588, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3885
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 8, 1980·No. No. 78-7563, CA 16819·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this action for fraud defendants appeal a judgment in favor of the plaintiff based on the jury verdict. Defendants assign as error the trial court’s refusal of defendants’ request for a poll of the jury, made immediately after the verdict was received. The statute in effect when this case was tried, ORS 17.355 (since repealed but with substantially the same language preserved in Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 59 G.(3)), gives a party an absolute right to a poll upon request. See Eisele v. Rood, 275 Or 461, 551 P2d 441 (1976).

A review of that portion of the record relevant to this issue satisfies us that defendants did not waive their right to have the jury polled.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brummett v. Parson, 619 P.2d 1355, 49 Or. App. 588, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3885 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

619 P.2d 1355 (Brummett v. Parson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Congdon v. Berg
299 P.3d 588 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2013)
St. Louis County v. Pennington
830 S.W.2d 553 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)
Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General Motors
629 P.2d 407 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)