Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC

New York Court of Appeals

Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC

1 N.Y.3d 590

DecidedJanuary 12, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.Y.3d 590 (Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC, 1 N.Y.3d 590 (N.Y. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as (1) dismissed appeals from Supreme Court orders denying reargument, (2) affirmed so much of a different Supreme Court order as denied appellant’s cross motion for leave to amend the complaint, and (3) denied appellant’s motion to enlarge the record on appeal, dismissed upon the ground that such portions of the order sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as (1) dismissed appeals from Supreme Court orders denying reargument, (2) affirmed so much of a different Supreme Court order as denied appellant’s cross motion for leave to amend the complaint, and (3) denied appellant’s motion to enlarge the record on appeal, dismissed upon the ground that such portions of the order sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.Y.3d 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruker-v-sullivan-and-liapakis-pc-ny-2004.