Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC

New York Court of Appeals

Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC

1 N.Y.3d 590

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 N.Y.2d 612 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 12, 2004·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as (1) dismissed appeals from Supreme Court orders denying reargument, (2) affirmed so much of a different Supreme Court order as denied appellant’s cross motion for leave to amend the complaint, and (3) denied appellant’s motion to enlarge the record on appeal, dismissed upon the ground that such portions of the order sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as (1) dismissed appeals from Supreme Court orders denying reargument, (2) affirmed so much of a different Supreme Court order as denied appellant’s cross motion for leave to amend the complaint, and (3) denied appellant’s motion to enlarge the record on appeal, dismissed upon the ground that such portions of the order sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC, 1 N.Y.3d 590 (N.Y. 2004).

Pincite

1 N.Y.3d 590 (Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.