Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC

100 N.Y.2d 612
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 23, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as (1) dismissed appeals from Supreme Court orders denying reargument, (2) affirmed so much of a different Supreme Court order as denied appellant’s cross motion for leave to amend the complaint, and (3) denied appellant’s motion to enlarge the record on appeal, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portions of the order appealed from do not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC, 100 N.Y.2d 612 (N.Y. 2003).

100 N.Y.2d 612 (Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MATTER OF BART v. Miller
799 N.E.2d 614 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)