Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC
This text of 100 N.Y.2d 612 (Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as (1) dismissed appeals from Supreme Court orders denying reargument, (2) affirmed so much of a different Supreme Court order as denied appellant’s cross motion for leave to amend the complaint, and (3) denied appellant’s motion to enlarge the record on appeal, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portions of the order appealed from do not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 N.Y.2d 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruker-v-sullivan-and-liapakis-pc-ny-2003.