Bruington Engineering, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bruington Engineering, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5579
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 31, 2014·No. 04-13-00558-CV·Published

Opinion

/s

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 31, 2014

No. 04-13-00558-CV

BRUINGTON ENGINEERING, LTD., Appellant

v.

PEDERNAL ENERGY, LLC, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas Trial Court No. 7,767 Honorable Jose A Lopez, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant’s reply brief was due on March 10, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(c). On March 26, 2014, Appellant filed an unopposed first motion for extension of time to file the reply brief and the reply brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s reply brief is deemed timely filed. See id. R. 38.6(d).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 31st day of March, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruington Engineering, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Bruington Engineering, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, LLC (Bruington Engineering, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.