Bruington Engineering, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bruington Engineering, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5579
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 31, 2014·No. 04-13-00558-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 30, 2014

No. 04-13-00558-CV

BRUINGTON ENGINEERING, LTD., Appellant

v.

PEDERNAL ENERGY, LLC, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas Trial Court No. 7,767 Honorable Jose A Lopez, Judge Presiding

ORDER Sitting: Catherine M. Stone, Chief Justice Karen A. Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice; dissenting, with opinion to follow Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice; dissenting Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena Chapa, Justice; dissenting

On August 27, 2014, this court issued its opinion in this appeal. Appellee Pedernal Energy, L.L.C. filed a motion for en banc reconsideration, and this court requested a response from Appellant. Having considered Appellee’s motion and Appellant’s response, a majority of the en banc court votes to DENY the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.7.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 30th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruington Engineering, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Bruington Engineering, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, LLC (Bruington Engineering, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.