Bruheim v. Little

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Bruheim v. Little

307 N.W.2d 276, 103 Wis. 2d 96, 1981 Wisc. LEXIS 2779

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedJune 30, 1981

Docket79-1607

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 307 N.W.2d 276 (Bruheim v. Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruheim v. Little, 307 N.W.2d 276, 103 Wis. 2d 96, 1981 Wisc. LEXIS 2779 (Wis. 1981).

Pincite

Opinions

[97]*97WILLIAM G. CALLOW, J.

The issue presented on this review is identical to that presented in Kranzush v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co., 103 Wis. 2d 56, 307 N.W.2d 256 (1981). That issue is whether a third-party-claimant’s complaint, alleging bad faith on the part of the tort-feasor’s insurer in failing to negotiate and settle her claim, states a claim upon which relief can be granted. The circuit court for Sauk' county, Hon. James R. Seer-ing presiding, granted the' defendants’ motion to dismiss the bad-faith count for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The. court of appeals affirmed .the dismissal, holding that an insurer’s settlement practices do not give rise to a bad-faith action in favor of a third-party claimant. Bruheim v. Little, 98 Wis.2d 178, 295 N.W.2d 793 (Ct. App. 1980).

The resolution of this case is controlled by our decision in Kranzush, and in view of our holding in that case, we affirm.

By the Court, — The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[97]*97WILLIAM G. CALLOW, J.

The issue presented on this review is identical to that presented in Kranzush v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co., 103 Wis. 2d 56, 307 N.W.2d 256 (1981). That issue is whether a third-party-claimant’s complaint, alleging bad faith on the part of the tort-feasor’s insurer in failing to negotiate and settle her claim, states a claim upon which relief can be granted. The circuit court for Sauk' county, Hon. James R. Seer-ing presiding, granted the' defendants’ motion to dismiss the bad-faith count for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The. court of appeals affirmed .the dismissal, holding that an insurer’s settlement practices do not give rise to a bad-faith action in favor of a third-party claimant. Bruheim v. Little, 98 Wis.2d 178, 295 N.W.2d 793 (Ct. App. 1980).

The resolution of this case is controlled by our decision in Kranzush, and in view of our holding in that case, we affirm.

By the Court, — The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 N.W.2d 276, 103 Wis. 2d 96, 1981 Wisc. LEXIS 2779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruheim-v-little-wis-1981.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack