Bruce v. State
878 So. 2d 465, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11244, 2004 WL 1673414
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bruce v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 879 So. 2d 686 →
Opinion
The conviction and sentence under review are affirmed. The only claim of trial error concerns the admission of certain testimony as to which no objection was preserved below and which ■ does not amount to fundamental error. Likewise, no error has been demonstrated in the sentence, as properly corrected by the trial judge.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bruce v. State, 878 So. 2d 465, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11244, 2004 WL 1673414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
878 So. 2d 465 (Bruce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.