Bruce v. State
878 So. 2d 465, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11244, 2004 WL 1673414
This text of 878 So. 2d 465 (Bruce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bruce v. State, 878 So. 2d 465, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11244, 2004 WL 1673414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
The conviction and sentence under review are affirmed. The only claim of trial error concerns the admission of certain testimony as to which no objection was preserved below and which ■ does not amount to fundamental error. Likewise, no error has been demonstrated in the sentence, as properly corrected by the trial judge.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
878 So. 2d 465, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11244, 2004 WL 1673414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.