Bruce D. Williams v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 28, 2010
Docket12-10-00102-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Bruce D. Williams v. State (Bruce D. Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruce D. Williams v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

NO. 12-10-00102-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS BRUCE D. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 2ND

V. ' DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant, Bruce D. Williams, attempts to appeal from an order denying his motion to dismiss his court appointed counsel. As a general rule, an appeal in a criminal case may be taken only from a judgment of conviction. See Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 622, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App.1961). However, there are certain narrow exceptions. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1998, no pet.) (listing exceptions). The order Appellant complains of is not a judgment of conviction nor does it fall within any exception to the general rule. Therefore, we have no jurisdiction over the appeals. On April 9, 2010, this court notified Appellant that the information received in this appeal does not include a final judgment or other appealable order and therefore does not show the jurisdiction of this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.2. Appellant was further notified that the appeal would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or before April 19, 2010 to show the jurisdiction of this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44 .3. This deadline has now passed, and Appellant has neither shown the jurisdiction of this court or otherwise responded to its April 9, 2010 notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Opinion delivered April 28, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Workman v. State
343 S.W.2d 446 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Wright v. State
969 S.W.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bruce D. Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-d-williams-v-state-texapp-2010.