Brown v. Voss

689 P.2d 1111, 38 Wash. App. 777
CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington
DecidedOctober 15, 1984
Docket6490-1-II
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 689 P.2d 1111 (Brown v. Voss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Voss, 689 P.2d 1111, 38 Wash. App. 777 (Wash. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Reed, J.

Defendants, Fred and Hattie Voss, owners of the servient estate, appeal from a judgment that denied their counterclaim for an injunction against Will and Jean Brown, plaintiffs, owners of the dominant estate. Defendants requested the injunction to prevent plaintiffs from using an easement appurtenant to gain access to a non-dominant estate adjacent to the dominant estate. We reverse and remand for entry of an injunction.

On April 1, 1977, plaintiffs purchased land (parcel B) from the Christensens. Parcel B is adjacent to and north of land (parcel A) owned by defendants. Access to parcel B is from the south, by means of a road that crosses several parcels, including parcel A. The roadway easement across parcel A arose by express grant to the Christensens to provide access to parcel B, and is appurtenant to said parcel. On July 31, 1977, the Browns purchased from the Rylanders the contiguous tract (parcel C) north of parcel B. Parcel C was not a dominant estate with respect to the easement across parcel A. The Browns plan to build a residence that would straddle the property line between parcels B and C.

*779 The Browns began clearing parcels B and C in November 1977, performing during the following spring and summer most of the preparation of the land for construction. To the existing easement road the Browns connected the new road that they had built across parcels B and C. After traversing parcel B, the new road crosses the line between parcels B and C, and then loops back onto parcel B. See sketch. The Browns have used the road in connection with their construction activities. The record indicates that in February and March of 1978, the Vosses erected a chain link fence along the side of the easement road. The parties have stip *780 ulated that the fence was located upon the 16-foot-wide easement. Sometime in 1978, the Vosses placed obstructions on the easement road.

*779 v9KN5bClcWt76hbt0nXCWH68BF85I8SlxwB

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. City of Seattle
156 P.3d 874 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. Thoeny
124 Wash. App. 381 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2004)
Brown v. Voss
715 P.2d 514 (Washington Supreme Court, 1986)
Hughes v. King County
714 P.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1986)
Radach v. Gunderson
695 P.2d 128 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
689 P.2d 1111, 38 Wash. App. 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-voss-washctapp-1984.