Brown v. University of State of New York

192 N.E. 416, 265 N.Y. 290, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1030
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 9, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per. Curiam.

The papers used on the motion for a preliminary injunction are not properly a part of the record when the appeal is from the judgment and the Appellate Division has decided that the motion for a declaratory judgment must be granted on the pleadings.

*291 In as much as the record has been printed it will be unnecessary to reprint the record on appeal, but on the argument the papers on the motion for a preliminary injunction will not be considered.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. University of State of New York, 192 N.E. 416, 265 N.Y. 290, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1030 (N.Y. 1934).

192 N.E. 416 (Brown v. University of State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. Hahn v. Haines
135 N.E.2d 723 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)