Brown v. University of State of New York

192 N.E. 416, 265 N.Y. 290, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1030
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 9, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 N.E. 416 (Brown v. University of State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. University of State of New York, 192 N.E. 416, 265 N.Y. 290, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1030 (N.Y. 1934).

Opinion

Per. Curiam.

The papers used on the motion for a preliminary injunction are not properly a part of the record when the appeal is from the judgment and the Appellate Division has decided that the motion for a declaratory judgment must be granted on the pleadings.

*291 In as much as the record has been printed it will be unnecessary to reprint the record on appeal, but on the argument the papers on the motion for a preliminary injunction will not be considered.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Hahn v. Haines
135 N.E.2d 723 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 N.E. 416, 265 N.Y. 290, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-university-of-state-of-new-york-ny-1934.