Brown v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. United States

406 F. App'x 820

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 4, 2011·No. No. 10-7353·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jaborie Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. United States, No. 7:10-cv-00390-jct-mfu, 2010 WL 3585431 (W.D.Va. Sept. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jaborie Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. United States, No. 7:10-cv-00390-jct-mfu, 2010 WL 3585431 (W.D.Va. Sept. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. United States, 406 F. App'x 820 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

406 F. App'x 820 (Brown v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related