Brown v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. United States

274 F. App'x 282

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 406 F. App'x 820 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2008·No. No. 08-6232·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. United States, No. 9:07-cv-03285-GRA, 2008 WL 153557 (D.S.C. filed Jan. 14, 2008; entered Jan. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. United States, No. 9:07-cv-03285-GRA, 2008 WL 153557 (D.S.C. filed Jan. 14, 2008; entered Jan. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. United States, 274 F. App'x 282 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

274 F. App'x 282 (Brown v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.