Brown v. Trump
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHARONLESLIEBROWN, SSS
Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 7909 (LLS) JUDGMENT DONALD TRUMP; KAMALA HARRIS; BARACK OBAMA; CORNELL WEST, Defendants. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 21, 2025, the Court has dismissed this action as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). All pending matters are terminated. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Judgment is entered dismissing this action. Dated: New York, New York July 22, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: 4K, Mange Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Trump (Brown v. Trump) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.