Brown v. Texas Central Railroad Company

94 S.W. 134, 42 Tex. Civ. App. 392, 1906 Tex. App. LEXIS 274
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 24, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 94 S.W. 134 (Brown v. Texas Central Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Texas Central Railroad Company, 94 S.W. 134, 42 Tex. Civ. App. 392, 1906 Tex. App. LEXIS 274 (Tex. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

SPEER, Associate Justice.

M. A. Brown and another sued Texas Central Railroad Company to recover damages to certain real estate caused by that company’s negligent construction of an embankment in such proximity to the land as to permanently injure the same. A verdict was directed for the company upon the issue of limitations and the plaintiffs have appealed.

The case was once before appealed to this court, when we construed the action to be one for constant and permanent injuries, as will be seen *393 from an examination of the recorded case in 13 Texas Court Reporter, page 816. If there were ever any doubts as to this being a correct interpretation of appellants’ petition, they disappeared in the light of the second amended petition filed after that opinion was rendered and upon which the last trial was had. In this pleading it is made clear that the embankment built by appellee adjacent to appellants’ property was a permanent nuisance immediately affecting the value of appellants’ property, and that the damages thereto were constant and permanent. As was stated by us on the first appeal: “This being true and the nuisance being permanent; the cause of action arose with the nuisance, and the measure of appellees’ (appellants’) damage would be the difference in the market value of their property immediately before and immediately after the construction of the embankment resulting in the injury complained of.” The undisputed evidence showing that the embankment was constructed more than two years prior to the institution of this suit, the court did right in instructing a verdict for appellee. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eidelbach v. Davis
99 S.W.2d 1067 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
City of Marlin v. Criswell
293 S.W. 910 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Gerlich v. Myers
290 S.W. 270 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Ehlert v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.
274 S.W. 172 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Wilson v. Avery Co. of Texas
182 S.W. 884 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.W. 134, 42 Tex. Civ. App. 392, 1906 Tex. App. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-texas-central-railroad-company-texapp-1906.