Brown v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Brown v. State

1915 OK CR 93, 146 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 699, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 91

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 6, 1915

DocketNo. A-2221.

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK CR 93 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, 1915 OK CR 93, 146 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 699, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 91 (Okla. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted under an information whch jointly charged that Link Brown and Mrs. Link Brown did unlawfully sell whisky to Zack Triet. The jury failed to fix the punishment. On the 26th day of January, 1914, the court sentenced Link Brown to be confined in the county jail for sixty days and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars, and sentenced Mrs. Link Brown to be confined in the county jail for thirty days and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. We have carefully examined the record and find that there is evidence sufficient to warrant the jury in reaching the conclusion that did in this case. There is no error disclosed by the record and we would not be warranted in reversing this case on the ground that the evidence is insufficient. The judgment of the county court of Jefferson county herein is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted under an information whch jointly charged that Link Brown and Mrs. Link Brown did unlawfully sell whisky to Zack Triet. The jury failed to fix the punishment. On the 26th day of January, 1914, the court sentenced Link Brown to be confined in the county jail for sixty days and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars, and sentenced Mrs. Link Brown to be confined in the county jail for thirty days and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. We have carefully examined the record and find that there is evidence sufficient to warrant the jury in reaching the conclusion that did in this case. There is no error disclosed by the record and we would not be warranted in reversing this case on the ground that the evidence is insufficient. The judgment of the county court of Jefferson county herein is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK CR 93, 146 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 699, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-oklacrimapp-1915.