Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. State

825 S.W.2d 71, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 361, 1992 WL 42942

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 927 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 1992·No. No. 59930·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Gregory Brown, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file and find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. In addition, we find that the motion court did not err in denying appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion. Appellant’s appeal of the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion is, therefore, affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Gregory Brown, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file and find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. In addition, we find that the motion court did not err in denying appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion. Appellant’s appeal of the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion is, therefore, affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Brown v. State, 825 S.W.2d 71, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 361, 1992 WL 42942 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

825 S.W.2d 71 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.