Brown v. State
783 S.W.2d 428, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1726, 1989 WL 146999
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4034 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Glen Brown, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court dismissed movant’s motion as untimely because it was not filed before June 30, 1988. Rule 29.15(m). The time limits as to when a Rule 29.15 motion must be filed are constitutional. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696[3] (Mo.banc 1989). The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(j). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 783 S.W.2d 428, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1726, 1989 WL 146999 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).
783 S.W.2d 428 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Day v. State
770 S.W.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1989)