Brown v. State
746 So. 2d 545, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16630, 1999 WL 1127688
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 1999·No. No. 98-00264·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In this appeal from his conviction and sentence for felony petit theft, Leonard Brown raises two issues, the first of which, an evidentiary question, has no merit. We write only to note that the second issue Mr. Brown has raised, concerning his habitual offender sentencing, has been disposed of in an independent appeal, Brown v. State, 744 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
Accordingly, this matter is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 746 So. 2d 545, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16630, 1999 WL 1127688 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
746 So. 2d 545 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Freeman v. State
746 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)