Brown v. State
680 So. 2d 562, 1996 WL 431164
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 623 So. 2d 800 →
Opinion
Darangton Brown appeals following his conviction and sentences for burglary and two violations of probation. We find merit only in his argument that the trial court erred in imposing a $2 cost pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because it is a discretionary cost that was not announced at sentencing. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Accordingly, we strike the $2 cost.
Conviction and sentences affirmed; cost stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 680 So. 2d 562, 1996 WL 431164 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
680 So. 2d 562 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)