Brown v. State
627 So. 2d 1342, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13230, 1993 WL 533821
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 577 So. 2d 708 →
Opinion
We previously reversed this ease because of improper prosecutorial comments during closing argument. Brown v. State, 593 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). On retrial, the [1343]*1343same prosecutor made the same improper argument regarding the appellant’s failure to call a witness. Accordingly, we reverse the conviction and remand this case, for a second time, for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 627 So. 2d 1342, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13230, 1993 WL 533821 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
627 So. 2d 1342 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
593 So. 2d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)