Brown v. State

576 So. 2d 396, 16 Fla. L. Weekly 721, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2194
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 524 So. 2d 730
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 14, 1991·No. No. 90-1646·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and certify the same question we certified in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990):

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE AS. SESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COM[397]*397MITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
COBB, GRIFFIN and DIAMÍANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 576 So. 2d 396, 16 Fla. L. Weekly 721, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

576 So. 2d 396 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flowers v. State
567 So. 2d 1055 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Walker v. State
546 So. 2d 764 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)