Brown v. State

633 So. 2d 487, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1992, 1994 WL 57594
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 577 So. 2d 708
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 1994·No. No. 92-3650·Published

Opinion

SHIVERS, Senior Judge.

Appellant challenges the legality of a sentencing provision requiring him to pay $250.00 for participating in the Bay County Work Program. We have recently held that these work program costs are without legal basis. E.g., Dykes v. State, 623 So.2d 827 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Jones v. State, 622 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Blanchette v. State, 620 So.2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Martin v. State, 618 So.2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Accordingly, we strike paragraph (13) of the sentencing order, the provision requiring Appellant to pay $250.00 as additional costs for participation in the Bay County Work Program, and we certify the same question of great public importance certified in Blanchette:

IS BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZED TO ESTABLISH PURSUANT TO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER AN ASSESSMENT TO COVER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH A PROBATIONER’S PARTICIPATION IN THE BAY COUNTY WORK PROGRAM?
WOLF and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 633 So. 2d 487, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1992, 1994 WL 57594 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

633 So. 2d 487 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. State
618 So. 2d 737 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Blanchette v. State
620 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Jones v. State
622 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Dykes v. State
623 So. 2d 827 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)