Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brown v. State

Brown v. State

513 So. 2d 710, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2259, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10356
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 400 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1987·No. No. BR-437·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals the denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We have reviewed the four grounds for relief raised by appellant and find them to be without merit. With one exception, the issues raised were previously considered and rejected in appellant’s direct appeal. Brown v. State, 464 So.2d 193 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), aff'd, 487 So.2d 1073 (Fla.1986). As to the remaining ground, his ineffective assistance of counsel claim, appellant failed to meet the requirements set forth in Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981) and therefore is not entitled to relief. Consequently, the trial court was correct in denying his motion.

AFFIRMED.

JO ANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 513 So. 2d 710, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2259, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10356 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

513 So. 2d 710 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
464 So. 2d 193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Knight v. State
394 So. 2d 997 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Brown v. State
487 So. 2d 1073 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)