Brown v. State

460 So. 2d 988, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 50, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16698
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 1984·No. No. 84-427·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only issue meriting discussion is whether the trial court erred in retaining jurisdiction over “the first third of the maximum sentence imposed” pursuant to Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1983), of a life sentence.

We adopt the position of the Third and Fifth Districts that Section 947.16(3) is inoperable. Kosek v. State, 448 So.2d 57 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Woodson v. State, 439 So.2d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Rodriguez v. State, 424 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and Cordero-Pena v. State, 421 So.2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Where a trial court imposes a life sentence, it is improper for it to retain jurisdiction over the first one-third of a life sentence because it is impossible to calculate the length of time over which jurisdiction is retained.

Accordingly, we remand and direct the trial judge to strike that portion of the order retaining jurisdiction. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 460 So. 2d 988, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 50, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16698 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

460 So. 2d 988 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. State
481 So. 2d 1285 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Stettler v. State
475 So. 2d 1009 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Mobley v. State
473 So. 2d 692 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)