Brown v. State

439 So. 2d 995, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22744
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 391 So. 2d 729
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 1983·No. No. 82-2165·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State agrees with appellant that error was committed under the facts of this case in imposing a minimum mandatory sentence of three years. Overfelt v. State, 434 So.2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We reverse this aspect.

While we could simply affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to apply for remedy via Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 as suggested by the State, we think it would conserve attorney time and judicial effort to address the matter here now. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction and remand with instructions to vacate the three year mandatory minimum which was attached to appellant’s ten year sentence.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 439 So. 2d 995, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22744 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

439 So. 2d 995 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Overfelt v. State
434 So. 2d 945 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)