Brown v. State
392 So. 2d 329, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18660
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 358 So. 2d 596 →
Opinion
The convictions for armed robbery and conspiracy to commit a felony are affirmed. We reverse the conviction for grand larceny which arose out of the robbery. The trial judge recognized that the larceny was a lesser included offense of the robbery and withheld imposition of sentence. Nevertheless, a defendant cannot be convicted of a lesser included offense and the higher offense arising out of the same transaction. The conviction for grand larceny is reversed. Haynes v. State, 377 So.2d 771 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 392 So. 2d 329, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18660 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
392 So. 2d 329 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haynes v. State
377 So. 2d 771 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)