Brown v. State

364 So. 2d 1251, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16699
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 338 So. 2d 573
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 1978·No. No. II-371·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record-on-appeal and the briefs filed by able counsel. Although the evidence giving rise to entry of the judgment and sentence here appealed was in conflict those conflicts were resolved by the trier of the fact for whose judgment we may not substitute ours. We find no error of law as applied to those facts. Further, the briefs and oral arguments of the parties reveal that each point here presented has been heretofore determined by decisions of this Court and of the Supreme Court of Florida. Nothing would be added to the jurisprudence of this State by again discussing those points here.

Appellant having failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the judgment and sentence appealed are

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 364 So. 2d 1251, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16699 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

364 So. 2d 1251 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.