Brown v. State

436 So. 2d 243, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22659
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 1983·No. No. 82-952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but agree that the sentence, which was predicated upon classification of the appellant as a youthful offender, was excessive. The state concedes this sentencing error on appeal. Specifically, the youthful offender scheme provides for a maximum commitment of six (6) years, section 958.05(2), Florida Statutes (1979), and that the term have no more than a one year minimum mandatory provision, section 958.05(3). The sentence imposed herein exceeds these limits.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but vacate the sentence and remand for a new sentence in accord with this opinion.

ANSTEAD, C.J., BERANEK, J., and CO-CALIS, PATRICIA W., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 436 So. 2d 243, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22659 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

436 So. 2d 243 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ross
447 So. 2d 1380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)