Brown v. State

314 So. 2d 721, 294 Ala. 241, 1975 Ala. LEXIS 1179
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 19, 1975·No. SC 1296·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

MADDOX, Justice.

Writ denied.

*242 By denying the writ, we point out that writs of certiorari are frequently denied without any consideration of the merits. Haden v. Olan Mills, Inc., 273 Ala. 129, 135 So.2d 388 (1961). A denial of certiorari should never be considered as an expression by the reviewing court on the merits of the controversy. See Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers, 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916). Our denial of the writ should not be understood as approving or disapproving the language used, or the statements of law contained in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Cooper v. State, 287 Ala. 728, 252 So.2d 108 (1971).

HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 314 So. 2d 721, 294 Ala. 241, 1975 Ala. LEXIS 1179 (Ala. 1975).

314 So. 2d 721 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shepherd v. SUMMIT MANAGEMENT CO., INC.
794 So. 2d 1110 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2000)
Gardner v. State
530 So. 2d 250 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Bighames v. State
440 So. 2d 1231 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Coulter v. State
438 So. 2d 336 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc.
648 P.2d 1192 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1982)
Brown v. State
314 So. 2d 717 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1975)