Brown v. Southern Paper Products Co.

24 S.E.2d 336, 222 N.C. 630, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 391
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Southern Paper Products Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 N.C. 626
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 3, 1943·Published

Opinion

Barnhill, J.

Tbe order for a new trial entered in tbe court below was interlocutory. It does not affect tbe merits of tbe case and is in no sense final. Hence, tbe appeal is premature.

*631 In view of wbat bas been said in Brown v. Products Co., ante, 626, there is no sound reason why we should exercise our discretionary right to express an opinion on the merits of the exceptive assignment of error as requested by defendant. Knight v. Little, 217 N. C., 681, 9 S. E. (2d), 377.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Southern Paper Products Co., 24 S.E.2d 336, 222 N.C. 630, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 391 (N.C. 1943).

24 S.E.2d 336 (Brown v. Southern Paper Products Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. . Little
9 S.E.2d 377 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)