Brown v. Southern Paper Products Co.

24 S.E.2d 336, 222 N.C. 630, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 391
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 3, 1943
StatusPublished

This text of 24 S.E.2d 336 (Brown v. Southern Paper Products Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Southern Paper Products Co., 24 S.E.2d 336, 222 N.C. 630, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 391 (N.C. 1943).

Opinion

Barnhill, J.

Tbe order for a new trial entered in tbe court below was interlocutory. It does not affect tbe merits of tbe case and is in no sense final. Hence, tbe appeal is premature.

*631 In view of wbat bas been said in Brown v. Products Co., ante, 626, there is no sound reason why we should exercise our discretionary right to express an opinion on the merits of the exceptive assignment of error as requested by defendant. Knight v. Little, 217 N. C., 681, 9 S. E. (2d), 377.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knight v. . Little
9 S.E.2d 377 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.E.2d 336, 222 N.C. 630, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-southern-paper-products-co-nc-1943.