Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

136 So. 2d 286, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1605
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 11, 1961·No. No. 428·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

TATE, Judge.

This is a companion suit to Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, 136 So.2d 283, arising out of the same accident and involving the same issue on appeal. For the reasons more fully assigned in the companion suit, we affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing the third party demand filed by the defendant-appellants impleading the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company as third party defendant. Costs to be paid by the defendants-appellants.

Affirmed.

On Application for Rehearing

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 136 So. 2d 286, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1605 (La. Ct. App. 1961).

136 So. 2d 286 (Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
136 So. 2d 283 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1961)