Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
This text of 136 So. 2d 286 (Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion suit to Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, 136 So.2d 283, arising out of the same accident and involving the same issue on appeal. For the reasons more fully assigned in the companion suit, we affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing the third party demand filed by the defendant-appellants impleading the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company as third party defendant. Costs to be paid by the defendants-appellants.
Affirmed.
On Application for Rehearing
En Banc. Rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 So. 2d 286, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-new-amsterdam-casualty-co-lactapp-1961.