Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

136 So. 2d 286, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1605
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 11, 1961
DocketNo. 428
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 So. 2d 286 (Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 136 So. 2d 286, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1605 (La. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

TATE, Judge.

This is a companion suit to Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, 136 So.2d 283, arising out of the same accident and involving the same issue on appeal. For the reasons more fully assigned in the companion suit, we affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing the third party demand filed by the defendant-appellants impleading the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company as third party defendant. Costs to be paid by the defendants-appellants.

Affirmed.

On Application for Rehearing

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
136 So. 2d 283 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 So. 2d 286, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-new-amsterdam-casualty-co-lactapp-1961.