Brown v. Lowe Et Ux.
188 S.E. 182, 182 S.C. 9, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 2
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The Court is satisfied, from a careful study of the questions presented by this appeal, that Judge Dennis correctly construed the written agreement referred to in his order, and that he properly disposed of all issues involved in the case. Eor the reasons, therefore, stated by him in his decree, which will be reported, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Lowe Et Ux., 188 S.E. 182, 182 S.C. 9, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 2 (S.C. 1936).
188 S.E. 182 (Brown v. Lowe Et Ux.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J & W Corporation v. Broad Creek Marina
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2023
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.
806 F.2d 961 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. The Liberty National Bank & Trust Co., Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. Utica National Bank and Trust Company
806 F.2d 961 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)
Ex Parte M.F.S. L. Ass'n
18 S.E.2d 592 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1942)
Zimmerman v. Central Union Bank
18 S.E.2d 592 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1942)