Brown v. Lowe Et Ux.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Brown v. Lowe Et Ux.

188 S.E. 182, 182 S.C. 9, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 2

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedOctober 29, 1936

Docket14366

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 188 S.E. 182 (Brown v. Lowe Et Ux.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Lowe Et Ux., 188 S.E. 182, 182 S.C. 9, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 2 (S.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Stabeer.

The Court is satisfied, from a careful study of the questions presented by this appeal, that Judge Dennis correctly construed the written agreement referred to in his order, and that he properly disposed of all issues involved in the case. Eor the reasons, therefore, stated by him in his decree, which will be reported, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Eishburne, and Mr. Acting Associate Justice A. L. Gaston concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Stabeer.

The Court is satisfied, from a careful study of the questions presented by this appeal, that Judge Dennis correctly construed the written agreement referred to in his order, and that he properly disposed of all issues involved in the case. Eor the reasons, therefore, stated by him in his decree, which will be reported, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Eishburne, and Mr. Acting Associate Justice A. L. Gaston concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 S.E. 182, 182 S.C. 9, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-lowe-et-ux-sc-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack