Brown v. King County
Opinion
1 2 3
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT SEATTLE 6 CLAUDE BROWN, 7 Plaintiff, C16-1340 TSZ 8 v. MINUTE ORDER 9 KING COUNTY, 10 Defendant.
11 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 12 (1) Having reviewed the parties’ responses, docket nos. 86 & 87, to the Court’s order 13 to show cause, docket no. 85, the Court hereby ORDERS that the trial in this matter shall be conducted virtually via ZoomGov.com, commencing on June 14, 2021. See General 14 Order No. 04-21 (continuing nearly all civil and criminal in-person trials that are scheduled to occur before June 30, 2021); see also Le v. King County, No. C18-55-TSZ, 15 2021 WL 859493, at *5 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 8, 2021) (holding that “‘good cause in compelling circumstances’ justify conducting [that] trial via a videoconferencing 16 platform, that ‘appropriate safeguards’ for doing so are in place, and that a continuance of the trial date is unnecessary and would be prejudicial to plaintiffs”). The applicable 17 procedures and protocols for the virtual trial will be set forth in a separate order.
18 (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record. 19 Dated this 21st day of April, 2021. 20 21 William M. McCool Clerk 22 s/Gail Glass
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. King County (Brown v. King County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.