Brown v. King County

W.D. Washington

Brown v. King County

DecidedApril 6, 2021

Docket2:16-cv-01340

StatusUnknown

This text of Brown v. King County (Brown v. King County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. King County, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT SEATTLE 6 CLAUDE BROWN, 7 Plaintiff, C16-1340 TSZ 8 v. MINUTE ORDER 9 KING COUNTY, 10 Defendant.

11 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 12 (1) On March 19, 2021, the Court entered General Order 04-21, continuing 13 nearly all civil and criminal in-person trials scheduled to occur before June 30, 2021. The parties are therefore ORDERED to show cause why this Court should not require 14 that this six-day jury trial, which is scheduled to begin on June 14, 2021, be conducted virtually over any party’s objection. See Joint Status Report at ¶ 4 (docket no. 78); see 15 also Le v. King County, No. C18-55-TSZ, 2021 WL 859493, at *6 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 8, 2021) (holding that “‘good cause in compelling circumstances’ justify conducting [that] 16 trial via a videoconferencing platform, that ‘appropriate safeguards’ for doing so are in place, and that a continuance of the trial date is unnecessary and would be prejudicial to 17 [the opposing party]”). The parties shall file their show-cause response, not to exceed four (4) pages in length, on or before Friday, April 16, 2021. 18 (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of 19 record. 20 Dated this 6th day of April, 2021. 21 William M. McCool 22 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT SEATTLE 6 CLAUDE BROWN, 7 Plaintiff, C16-1340 TSZ 8 v. MINUTE ORDER 9 KING COUNTY, 10 Defendant.

11 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 12 (1) On March 19, 2021, the Court entered General Order 04-21, continuing 13 nearly all civil and criminal in-person trials scheduled to occur before June 30, 2021. The parties are therefore ORDERED to show cause why this Court should not require 14 that this six-day jury trial, which is scheduled to begin on June 14, 2021, be conducted virtually over any party’s objection. See Joint Status Report at ¶ 4 (docket no. 78); see 15 also Le v. King County, No. C18-55-TSZ, 2021 WL 859493, at *6 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 8, 2021) (holding that “‘good cause in compelling circumstances’ justify conducting [that] 16 trial via a videoconferencing platform, that ‘appropriate safeguards’ for doing so are in place, and that a continuance of the trial date is unnecessary and would be prejudicial to 17 [the opposing party]”). The parties shall file their show-cause response, not to exceed four (4) pages in length, on or before Friday, April 16, 2021. 18 (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of 19 record. 20 Dated this 6th day of April, 2021. 21 William M. McCool 22 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Brown v. King County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-king-county-wawd-2021.