Brown v. Johnson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 363 F. App'x 246
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 28, 2011·No. 10-7641·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7641

KEITH MICHAEL BROWN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00501-RBS-DEM).

Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 28, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Keith Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to

state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Brown v. Johnson, No. 2:10-cv-00510-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 22,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2011).

Brown v. Johnson (Brown v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)