Brown v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Johnson

409 F. App'x 713

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 363 F. App'x 246 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 28, 2011·No. No. 10-7641·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Johnson, No. 2:10-cv-00510-RBS-DEM (E.D.Va. Oct. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Johnson, No. 2:10-cv-00510-RBS-DEM (E.D.Va. Oct. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Johnson, 409 F. App'x 713 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

409 F. App'x 713 (Brown v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related