Brown v. Johnson
This text of Brown v. Johnson (Brown v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7641
KEITH MICHAEL BROWN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00501-RBS-DEM).
Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 28, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Keith Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to
state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Brown v. Johnson, No. 2:10-cv-00510-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 22,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-johnson-ca4-2011.