Brown v. Hynes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brown v. Hynes

21 A.D.3d 414, 799 N.Y.S.2d 419, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 8, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent to vacate, as academic, a complaint and warrant issued under Kangs County Docket No. 9K045019 in a case entitled People v Brown in the Supreme Court, Kings [415]*415County, under indictment No. 9463/89. Application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is

Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

By order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 25, 2005, the complaint and warrant issued under Kings County docket No. 9K045019 were vacated and the docket dismissed. Thus, the instant petition has been rendered academic. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent to vacate, as academic, a complaint and warrant issued under Kangs County Docket No. 9K045019 in a case entitled People v Brown in the Supreme Court, Kings [415]*415County, under indictment No. 9463/89. Application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is

Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

By order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 25, 2005, the complaint and warrant issued under Kings County docket No. 9K045019 were vacated and the docket dismissed. Thus, the instant petition has been rendered academic. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Hynes, 21 A.D.3d 414, 799 N.Y.S.2d 419, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

21 A.D.3d 414 (Brown v. Hynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related