Brown v. Holder

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 770 F. Supp. 2d 363
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided February 15, 2011·No. Civil Action No. 2010-2225·Published

Opinion

UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT CoURT F 1 L E D FoR THE 1)1sTR1CT oF CoLIJMBIA

FEB l 5 2011 _ ' t' t& Bankruptcy

ROBERT BROWN, ) C(i)\iii\t(s `f]orstli)ea\i)i;?crict of Golumbia

Plaintiff, §

v. g Civil Action No. 10-2225

ERIC HOLDER, et al., g

Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the

Court would consider the plaintiff’ s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § l9l5. To date, plaintiff has not submitted the required inforrnation. Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to proceed l

in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

i\/¢A~m.,’

/ v DATE: / D/ RD// United States Disti‘ict Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Holder, (D.D.C. 2011).

Brown v. Holder (Brown v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.