Brown v. Holder
This text of Brown v. Holder (Brown v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT CoURT F 1 L E D FoR THE 1)1sTR1CT oF CoLIJMBIA
FEB l 5 2011 _ ' t' t& Bankruptcy
ROBERT BROWN, ) C(i)\iii\t(s `f]orstli)ea\i)i;?crict of Golumbia
Plaintiff, §
v. g Civil Action No. 10-2225
ERIC HOLDER, et al., g
Defendants. §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the
Court would consider the plaintiff’ s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § l9l5. To date, plaintiff has not submitted the required inforrnation. Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to proceed l
in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint without prejudice.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
i\/¢A~m.,’
/ v DATE: / D/ RD// United States Disti‘ict Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-holder-dcd-2011.