Brown v. Harvey Coal Corp.

Sixth Circuit

Brown v. Harvey Coal Corp.

61 F.2d 624, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4359

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 11, 1932

DocketNo. 6018

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 61 F.2d 624 (Brown v. Harvey Coal Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Harvey Coal Corp., 61 F.2d 624, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4359 (6th Cir. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a law ease tried by agreement of the parties by the court below without a jury. The evidence introduced before the court is set out in the record, but there is no bill of exceptions. A general judgment was rendered for the defendant pursuant to an opinion filed by the court. No findings of fact were made or requested, nor did the plaintiffs (appellants here) take exceptions at any time during the progress of the trial to rulings on matters of law, or duly preserve them by bill of exceptions. In this state of the record, matters of fact or conclusions of law embodied in the general finding are not open to review. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States, 270 U. S. 349, 46 S. Ct. 284, 70 L. Ed. 624; Law v. United States, 266 U. S. 494, 45 S. Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401; United States v. Gordin, 9 F.(2d) 394 (6 C. C. A.); Roark v. Fordson Coal Co., 10 F.(2d) 70, 71 (6 C. C. A.); Oyler v. Cleveland, etc., Ry. Co., 16 F.(2d) 455 (6 C. C. A.); Akre v. Liberty State Bank (C. C. A.) 24 F.(2d) 816; Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation v. Pearson, 37 F.(2d) 896 (6 C. C. A.); Wynne v. Fries, 50 F.(2d) 761 (6 C. C. A.).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a law ease tried by agreement of the parties by the court below without a jury. The evidence introduced before the court is set out in the record, but there is no bill of exceptions. A general judgment was rendered for the defendant pursuant to an opinion filed by the court. No findings of fact were made or requested, nor did the plaintiffs (appellants here) take exceptions at any time during the progress of the trial to rulings on matters of law, or duly preserve them by bill of exceptions. In this state of the record, matters of fact or conclusions of law embodied in the general finding are not open to review. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States, 270 U. S. 349, 46 S. Ct. 284, 70 L. Ed. 624; Law v. United States, 266 U. S. 494, 45 S. Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401; United States v. Gordin, 9 F.(2d) 394 (6 C. C. A.); Roark v. Fordson Coal Co., 10 F.(2d) 70, 71 (6 C. C. A.); Oyler v. Cleveland, etc., Ry. Co., 16 F.(2d) 455 (6 C. C. A.); Akre v. Liberty State Bank (C. C. A.) 24 F.(2d) 816; Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation v. Pearson, 37 F.(2d) 896 (6 C. C. A.); Wynne v. Fries, 50 F.(2d) 761 (6 C. C. A.).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 F.2d 624, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-harvey-coal-corp-ca6-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack