Brown v. Gray
This text of Brown v. Gray (Brown v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED
~ ":'111 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT cl " " Brk, U.S. Dlstnct & Bankru
FCR THE DISTR1CT CF C()LUMBIA Courts for the District of Co|uiiif)i(a SHIRON BROWN, Plaintiff, v. : Civil Action No. ll 3
VINCENT GRAY,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION For purposes of this Memorandum Opinion, the Court consolidates six complaints and
applications to proceed in forma pauperz`s. Each complaint names a single defendant for whom plaintiff supplies a District of Columbia address, and the maximum amount plaintiff demands in damages is $40,000. ln no case does plaintiff establish federal question jurisdiction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or diversity jurisdiction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss these complaints for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
An Order accompanies this Mem0randum Opinion.
United tat istrict judge
DATE; 7/;7/,,
Attachment A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Gray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-gray-dcd-2011.