Brown v. California Department of Corrections

536 U.S. 936, 122 S. Ct. 2645, 153 L. Ed. 2d 801, 70 U.S.L.W. 3789, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 4864
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 24, 2002·No. 01-9821·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. California Department of Corrections, 536 U.S. 936, 122 S. Ct. 2645, 153 L. Ed. 2d 801, 70 U.S.L.W. 3789, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 4864 (2002).

536 U.S. 936 (Brown v. California Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cole v. City of Dallas
314 F.3d 730 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Stucky v. City of San Antonio
307 F.3d 315 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)