Brown v. Brown

190 A.D.2d 668, 594 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 793
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— In a child custody proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (De-Maro, J.), dated January 28, 1992, which, upon the appellant’s default in appearing for scheduled court dates, inter alia, directed that the appellant have no contact with her infant son.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from an order made upon the default of the aggrieved party (see, CPLR 5511). The proper procedure would have been for the appellant to move to open her default and to vacate the order dated January 28, 1992, and if necessary, appeal from the denial of the motion to vacate the default (see, Grober v Busigo, 133 AD2d 389; Imor v Imor, 114 AD2d 552; Calvagno v Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 110 AD2d 741). Bracken, J. P., Fiber, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Brown, 190 A.D.2d 668, 594 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

190 A.D.2d 668 (Brown v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Rose W.
196 A.D.2d 313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)