Brown v. Brantley

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia
DecidedMay 5, 2025
Docket1:25-cv-00047
StatusUnknown

This text of Brown v. Brantley (Brown v. Brantley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Brantley, (S.D. Ga. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION PATRICK BROWN, ) Petitioner, v. CV 125-047 SHERIFF GINO BRANTLEY, Respondent.

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, and DISMISSES the petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 without prejudice. Further, a state prisoner seeking relief under § 2241 must obtain a certificate of appealability (“COA”) before appealing the denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. See Sawyer v. Holder, 326 F.3d 1363, 1364 n.3 (11th Cir. 2003) (“[S]tate prisoners proceeding under § 2241 must obtain a COA to appeal.”) This Court should grant a COA only if the prisoner makes a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, and in consideration of the standards enunciated in Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 482-84 (2000), Petitioner has failed to make the requisite showing. Accordingly, the Court DENIES a COA

in this case. Moreover, because there are no non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal, an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and Petitioner is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Upon the foregoing, the Court CLOSES this civil action. SO ORDERED this a 7 day of , 2025, at Augusta, Georgia. ( x) of ,, Lo Ye a 4 / OCREL. HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL UNITED SYATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James Sawyer v. Carlyle Holder, Warden
326 F.3d 1363 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brown v. Brantley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-brantley-gasd-2025.