Brown v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad
This text of 62 S.E. 186 (Brown v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. While a defendant may file an answer to an amendment to the petition in a ease, admitting or denying material allegations in the same, or stating why he can neither admit nor deny them, he is not required to file an answer to the amendment, and his failure to do so does not authorize the court or jury to treat the allegations in the amendment as being admitted. Hudson v. Hudson, 119 Ga. 637 (46 S. E. 874).
2. Upon the controlling question raised in the record, this case is ruled by the decision in the case of Hawkins v. Central of Georgia Railway Company, 119 Ga. 159 (46 S. E. 82).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 S.E. 186, 131 Ga. 259, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-atlanta-birmingham-atlantic-railroad-ga-1908.