Brown v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedNovember 17, 2023
Docket2:23-cv-01997
StatusUnknown

This text of Brown v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry (Brown v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, (D. Ariz. 2023).

Opinion

1 MDR 2 WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Douglas Bryce Brown, No. CV-23-01997-PHX-JAT (DMF) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Arizona Department of Corrections, et 13 al., 14 Defendants.

16 Pro se Plaintiff Douglas Bryce Brown, who is confined in CoreCivic’s Red Rock 17 Correctional Center, filed a civil rights Complaint (Doc. 1) but did not pay the $350.00 18 civil action filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file an Application to Proceed In 19 Forma Pauperis. The Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend and will give 20 Plaintiff 30 days to (1) file an amended complaint on a court-approved form and (2) either 21 pay the filing and administrative fees or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma 22 Pauperis. 23 I. Payment of Filing Fee 24 When bringing an action, a prisoner must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and a 25 $52.00 administrative fee in a lump sum or, if granted the privilege of proceeding in forma 26 pauperis, pay the $350.00 filing fee incrementally as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 27 An application to proceed in forma pauperis requires an affidavit of indigence and a 28 certified copy of the inmate’s trust account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 1 six months preceding the filing of the Complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). An inmate must 2 submit statements from each institution where he was confined during the six-month 3 period. Id. To assist prisoners in meeting these requirements, the Court requires use of a 4 form application. LRCiv 3.4. 5 If a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will assess an 6 initial partial filing fee of 20% of either the average monthly deposits or the average 7 monthly balance in Plaintiff’s account, whichever is greater. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). An 8 initial partial filing fee will only be collected when funds exist. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). 9 The balance of the $350.00 filing fee will be collected in monthly payments of 20% of the 10 preceding month’s income credited to an inmate’s account, each time the amount in the 11 account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 12 Because Plaintiff has not paid the $402.00 filing and administrative fees or filed an 13 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, the Court will give Plaintiff 30 days from the 14 filing date of this Order to submit a properly executed and certified Application to Proceed 15 In Forma Pauperis, using the form included with this Order, or pay the $402.00 filing and 16 administrative fees. 17 The Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry (ADC) has 18 notified the Court that a certified trust fund account statement showing deposits and 19 average monthly balances is available from the ADC’s Central Office. Accordingly, 20 Plaintiff must obtain the certified copy of his ADC trust fund account statement for the six 21 months immediately preceding the filing of the Complaint from the ADC’s Central Office. 22 II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 23 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 24 against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 25 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff 26 has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which 27 relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from 28 such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)–(2). 1 Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.4 requires in part that “[a]ll complaints and 2 applications to proceed in forma pauperis by incarcerated persons shall be signed and 3 legibly written or typewritten on forms approved by the Court and in accordance with the 4 instructions provided with the forms.” Plaintiff’s Complaint is not on a court-approved 5 form as required by Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.4. Plaintiff’s Complaint will therefore 6 be dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend, in order for Plaintiff to file an 7 amended complaint on a court-approved form. 8 III. Leave to Amend 9 Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first amended complaint on a court-approved 10 form. The Clerk of Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first 11 amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike 12 the amended complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 13 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First 14 Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 15 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 16 Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. 17 A first amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 18 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 19 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint 20 as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the 21 original Complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without prejudice 22 is waived if it is not alleged in a first amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 23 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 24 If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements 25 telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name 26 of the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to 27 do; (4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of 28 1 Plaintiff’s constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of 2 that Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). 3 Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If 4 Plaintiff fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific 5 injury suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for 6 failure to state a claim. Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of 7 Defendants has violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be 8 dismissed. 9 IV. Warnings 10 A. Address Changes 11 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 12 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 13 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 14 action. 15 B. Possible Dismissal 16 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 17 warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d 18 at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of 19 the Court). 20 IT IS ORDERED: 21 (1) The Complaint (Doc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brown v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-arizona-department-of-corrections-rehabilitation-and-reentry-azd-2023.